From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: RFC: Survey on release cycle Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:32:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20151015123257.GA8649@aepfle.de> References: <1444901621.1607.45.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmhiO-0000oz-Ol for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:33:01 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1444901621.1607.45.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Xen-devel Cc: Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Oct 15, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > # 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme > # 6 months release cycle + extended security support > > +1 to either of these, but +2 for picking one of them. +1, as Ian said. > (not really sure how to express that in a vote, sorry). > > > # 6 months release cycle + LTS scheme 0 > > # 9 months release cycle + current stable release scheme 0 Olaf