From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:14:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms In-Reply-To: References: <1444050140-24733-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20151016071419.GC31804@x1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 5 October 2015 at 18:32, Lee Jones wrote: > > Hi Jassi, > > > > This should be it. Exciting times! > > > > ST's platforms currently support a maximum of 5 Mailboxes, one for > > each of the supported co-processors situated on the platform. Each > > Mailbox is divided up into 4 instances which consist of 32 channels. > > Messages are passed between the application and co-processors using > > shared memory areas. > > > > Also included in the set is an example Client which should be generic > > enough to use as a testing environment for all Mailbox IPs which use > > shared memory or the API to pass messages. With small changes, it > > should also be able to test more extravagant implementations. > > > > v3 -> v4: > > - More protection in MBOX_BASE() MACRO > > - Remove unused tx-only marker > > > Are you sure about the tx-only marker? :) > > Since it is also a DT property, I think we should have it removed > before we apply the patchset. Lets get it done today. Wow! I can't even explain that. It's gone from my local repo! -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:14:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20151016071419.GC31804@x1> References: <1444050140-24733-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jassi Brar Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , lkml , Devicetree List , Jassi Brar List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 5 October 2015 at 18:32, Lee Jones wrote: > > Hi Jassi, > > > > This should be it. Exciting times! > > > > ST's platforms currently support a maximum of 5 Mailboxes, one for > > each of the supported co-processors situated on the platform. Each > > Mailbox is divided up into 4 instances which consist of 32 channels= =2E > > Messages are passed between the application and co-processors using > > shared memory areas. > > > > Also included in the set is an example Client which should be gener= ic > > enough to use as a testing environment for all Mailbox IPs which us= e > > shared memory or the API to pass messages. With small changes, it > > should also be able to test more extravagant implementations. > > > > v3 -> v4: > > - More protection in MBOX_BASE() MACRO > > - Remove unused tx-only marker > > > Are you sure about the tx-only marker? :) >=20 > Since it is also a DT property, I think we should have it removed > before we apply the patchset. Lets get it done today. Wow! I can't even explain that. It's gone from my local repo! --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753605AbbJPHOY (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:14:24 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com ([209.85.217.171]:33336 "EHLO mail-lb0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752422AbbJPHOX (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:14:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:14:19 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Jassi Brar Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , lkml , Devicetree List , Jassi Brar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Message-ID: <20151016071419.GC31804@x1> References: <1444050140-24733-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 5 October 2015 at 18:32, Lee Jones wrote: > > Hi Jassi, > > > > This should be it. Exciting times! > > > > ST's platforms currently support a maximum of 5 Mailboxes, one for > > each of the supported co-processors situated on the platform. Each > > Mailbox is divided up into 4 instances which consist of 32 channels. > > Messages are passed between the application and co-processors using > > shared memory areas. > > > > Also included in the set is an example Client which should be generic > > enough to use as a testing environment for all Mailbox IPs which use > > shared memory or the API to pass messages. With small changes, it > > should also be able to test more extravagant implementations. > > > > v3 -> v4: > > - More protection in MBOX_BASE() MACRO > > - Remove unused tx-only marker > > > Are you sure about the tx-only marker? :) > > Since it is also a DT property, I think we should have it removed > before we apply the patchset. Lets get it done today. Wow! I can't even explain that. It's gone from my local repo! -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog