From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:40:25 -0700 Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 2/4] staging: lustre: hash.c: replace IS_PO2 by is_power_of_2 In-Reply-To: <798c319bad7c0c621b608f499860eaaa1c78d03d.1445032901.git.mahfouz.saif.elyazal@gmail.com> References: <798c319bad7c0c621b608f499860eaaa1c78d03d.1445032901.git.mahfouz.saif.elyazal@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20151017054025.GA25392@kroah.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:06:28AM +0200, Aya Mahfouz wrote: > Replaces IS_PO2 by is_power_of_2. IS_PO2 is used with several debug > macros. In this case, it is CDEBUG. Note that the replacement changes > the types involved, because the parameter of IS_PO2 is of type long long > and the return type is int, while the parameter of is_power_of_2 is of > type long and the return type is bool. This, however, has no impact, > because the actual argument is always of type int, and the return value > is always used as a boolean. > > Signed-off-by: Aya Mahfouz > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c > index 6f4c7d4..4b5e79a 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c > @@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ > > #include "../../include/linux/libcfs/libcfs.h" > #include > +#include > + > > #if CFS_HASH_DEBUG_LEVEL >= CFS_HASH_DEBUG_1 > static unsigned int warn_on_depth = 8; > @@ -1785,7 +1787,7 @@ cfs_hash_rehash_cancel_locked(struct cfs_hash *hs) > for (i = 2; cfs_hash_is_rehashing(hs); i++) { > cfs_hash_unlock(hs, 1); > /* raise console warning while waiting too long */ > - CDEBUG(IS_PO2(i >> 3) ? D_WARNING : D_INFO, > + CDEBUG(is_power_of_2(i >> 3) ? D_WARNING : D_INFO, is_power_of_2() works differently than IS_PO2(), are you _sure_ that the value here can not be 0? If so, this will do something different :( thanks, greg k-h