All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@gmail.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] tcp: track min RTT using windowed min-filter
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:39:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019043907.GA11368@mininet-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151014092800.GA3748@mininet-vm>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 02:28:00AM -0700, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:57:42PM -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
> > index 86a7eda..90edef5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
> > @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ struct tcp_sock {
> >  	u32	mdev_max_us;	/* maximal mdev for the last rtt period	*/
> >  	u32	rttvar_us;	/* smoothed mdev_max			*/
> >  	u32	rtt_seq;	/* sequence number to update rttvar	*/
> > +	struct rtt_meas {
> > +		u32 rtt, ts;	/* RTT in usec and sampling time in jiffies. */
> > +	} rtt_min[3];
> 
> First, thanks for all the work in this patch series. In particular,
> applying Kern's check to ca_seq_rtt_us should fix some bad behavior
> I've observed recently.

I'd have to run more tests to be sure, but net-next with this patch series
significantly improves upon the poor behavior I was seeing where randomly
dropped packets greatly limited the usefulness of RTTs as a signal of
congestion. I still see some measurements that exceed the amount of delay
possible from queue buildup, but fewer than before.

Thanks!

-Andrew

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-19  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-17  4:57 [PATCH net-next 0/7] RACK loss detection Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] tcp: apply Kern's check on RTTs used for congestion control Yuchung Cheng
2016-02-02 19:30   ` Kenneth Klette Jonassen
2016-02-02 23:28     ` Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] tcp: track min RTT using windowed min-filter Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-14  9:28   ` Andrew Shewmaker
2015-10-18 14:33     ` Neal Cardwell
2015-10-14 13:25       ` Andrew Shewmaker
2015-10-19  4:39     ` Andrew Shewmaker [this message]
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] tcp: remove tcp_mark_lost_retrans() Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] tcp: add tcp_tsopt_ecr_before helper Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] tcp: skb_mstamp_after helper Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] tcp: track the packet timings in RACK Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] tcp: use RACK to detect losses Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-21 14:01 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] RACK loss detection David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151019043907.GA11368@mininet-vm \
    --to=agshew@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.