From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"changchun.ouyang@intel.com" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] virtio: clean up space checks on xmit
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:48:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019084835.7bbeb2c3@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B12B838@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:02:07 +0000
"Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com> wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 1:16 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > The space check for transmit ring only needs a single conditional.
> > I.e only need to recheck for space if there was no space in first check.
> I see you reorganized the code. It is more clear and readable with your
> change, but no check is removed.
> We could remove the check after virtio_xmit_cleanup. In current
> implementation, we assume the virtio_xmit_cleanup and vq_ring_free_chain
> always succeed.
The only case that matters is if virtio_xmit_cleanup can not
free up any slots.
> > This can help performance and simplifies loop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > index c5b53bb..5b50ed0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > @@ -745,7 +745,6 @@ uint16_t
> > virtio_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> > {
> > struct virtqueue *txvq = tx_queue;
> > - struct rte_mbuf *txm;
> > uint16_t nb_used, nb_tx;
> > int error;
> >
> > @@ -759,57 +758,46 @@ virtio_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> > if (likely(nb_used > txvq->vq_nentries - txvq->vq_free_thresh))
> > virtio_xmit_cleanup(txvq, nb_used);
> >
> > - nb_tx = 0;
> > + for (nb_tx = 0; nb_tx < nb_pkts; nb_tx++) {
> > + struct rte_mbuf *txm = tx_pkts[nb_tx];
> > + int need = txm->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> >
> > - while (nb_tx < nb_pkts) {
> > - /* Need one more descriptor for virtio header. */
> > - int need = tx_pkts[nb_tx]->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> > -
> > - /*Positive value indicates it need free vring descriptors */
> > + /* Positive value indicates it need free vring descriptors */
> As you fix the comment, if it is correct, could you do s/need/needs/ as
> well, :)?
> > if (unlikely(need > 0)) {
> > nb_used = VIRTQUEUE_NUSED(txvq);
> > virtio_rmb();
> > need = RTE_MIN(need, (int)nb_used);
> >
> > virtio_xmit_cleanup(txvq, need);
> > - need = (int)tx_pkts[nb_tx]->nb_segs -
> > - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Zero or negative value indicates it has enough free
> > - * descriptors to use for transmitting.
> > - */
> > - if (likely(need <= 0)) {
> > - txm = tx_pkts[nb_tx];
> > -
> > - /* Do VLAN tag insertion */
> > - if (unlikely(txm->ol_flags & PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT)) {
> > - error = rte_vlan_insert(&txm);
> > - if (unlikely(error)) {
> > - rte_pktmbuf_free(txm);
> > - ++nb_tx;
> > - continue;
> > - }
> Still need is rechecked here. It could be removed if virtio_xmit_cleanup
> ensures need would be <= 0 after the call.
> > + need = txm->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> > + if (unlikely(need > 0)) {
> > + PMD_TX_LOG(ERR,
> > + "No free tx descriptors to transmit");
> > + break;
> > }
> > + }
> >
> > - /* Enqueue Packet buffers */
> > - error = virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(txvq, txm);
> > + /* Do VLAN tag insertion */
> > + if (unlikely(txm->ol_flags & PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT)) {
> > + error = rte_vlan_insert(&txm);
> > if (unlikely(error)) {
> > - if (error == ENOSPC)
> > - PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count = 0");
> > - else if (error == EMSGSIZE)
> > - PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count < 1");
> > - else
> > - PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue error: %d", error);
> > - break;
> > + rte_pktmbuf_free(txm);
> > + continue;
> > }
> > - nb_tx++;
> > - txvq->bytes += txm->pkt_len;
> > - } else {
> > - PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "No free tx descriptors to transmit");
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Enqueue Packet buffers */
> > + error = virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(txvq, txm);
> > + if (unlikely(error)) {
> > + if (error == ENOSPC)
> > + PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count = 0");
> > + else if (error == EMSGSIZE)
> > + PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count < 1");
> > + else
> > + PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue error: %d", error);
> > break;
> > }
> > + txvq->bytes += txm->pkt_len;
> > }
> >
> > txvq->packets += nb_tx;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 5:16 [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] virtio: clean up space checks on xmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 8:02 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 15:48 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-10-19 16:27 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] virtio: don't use unlikely for normal tx stuff Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] virtio: use indirect ring elements Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 13:19 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 15:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:18 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-30 18:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] virtio: use any layout on transmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:28 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 16:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:56 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 23:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 17:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] virtio: optimize transmit enqueue Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-20 1:48 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-21 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-22 10:38 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-22 12:13 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-22 16:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-23 9:00 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 23:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-27 1:56 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-27 2:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-27 2:38 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 14:05 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-05 8:10 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-06 12:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-14 13:49 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-04 6:18 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-04 18:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-08 1:38 ` Xie, Huawei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019084835.7bbeb2c3@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=changchun.ouyang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.