From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753973AbbJSTJj (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:09:39 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:33316 "EHLO mail-lf0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752567AbbJSTJi (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:09:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:09:32 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: David Ahern , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa , Hitoshi Mitake , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] perf/bench/mem: Rename 'routine' to 'routine_str' Message-ID: <20151019190931.GA20927@gmail.com> References: <1445241870-24854-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> <1445241870-24854-9-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> <5624F176.5040801@gmail.com> <20151019185447.GF2359@redhat.com> <20151019185607.GG2359@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151019185607.GG2359@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:54:47PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:34:46AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu: > > > On 10/19/15 2:04 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static void __bench_mem_routine(struct bench_mem_info *info, int r_idx, size_t l > > > > double result_bps = 0.0; > > > > u64 result_cycles = 0; > > > > > > > >- printf("Routine %s (%s)\n", r->name, r->desc); > > > >+ printf("routine %s (%s)\n", r->name, r->desc); > > > > > > > > if (bench_format == BENCH_FORMAT_DEFAULT) > > > > printf("# Copying %s Bytes ...\n\n", length_str); > > > > > > Seems like 'R' is more appropriate here. > > > > Right, changed it. > > And then, he does that on a later patch, duh. Yeah, indeed - I messed that up: tried to introduce __unused but noticed during development and testing on other distros that '__unused' is way too crowded a namespace (various fields in random headers are named like that), so after a bit of a fight with those headers I changed it back to __maybe_unused ... but the original change slipped into the series. Do you want me to resend the series to fix this and the other problems David and you noticed? Thanks, Ingo