All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Cc: "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pmarrecas@outlook.com" <pmarrecas@outlook.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Andrey Filippov <andrey@elphel.com>,
	Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Subject: Re: [Resend Patch v6] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:36:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020003604.GF19782@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR03MB14694C6FFC8BA80C08EB039ABE390@CY1PR03MB1469.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

On 10/20, York Sun wrote:
> Sorry for top posting. I am on outlook web.
> 
> We have no problem with device tree. Let's put it aside.
> 
> When device is not used, the platform data is used to hold the data, filled by a platform device before probing the clock. For my case, the platform device is a PCIe device. It is a multifunction device with I2C controller on it. The pseudo code looks like
> 
> struct i2c_board_info si5338_info[NUM_SI5338_CHIPS] = {
>         {
>                 .type = "si5338",
>                 .platform_data = &si5338_pdata[0],
>         },
>         {
>                 .type = "si5338",
>                 .platform_data = &si5338_pdata[1],
>         },
>         {
>                 .type = "si5338",
>                 .platform_data = &si5338_pdata[2],
>         },
>         {
>                 .type = "si5338",
>                 .platform_data = &si5338_pdata[3],
>         },
> };
> clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(&pdev->dev, "ref25", NULL, CLK_IS_ROOT, 25000000);
> for (i = 0; i < NUM_SI5338_CHIPS; i++) {
>     si5338_pdata[i].clk_xtal = clk;
>     adap = i2c_get_adapter(private->i2c_adp->nr + 1 + i);
>     private->i2c_client[i] = i2c_new_probed_device(adap, &si5338_info[i], i2c_si5338_addr, NULL);
> }
> 
> You can see, when the fixed-rate clock is registered, the device id of si5338 is unknown yet. (I am using one 25MHz clock to feed multiple si5338, where maybe I should create multiple 25MHz clocks, but that's another discussion.)
> 
> I hope I have made it clear.

Yes. It would be great if we could modify the i2c framework to
let us create an i2c device but not call device_register() until a later
time. So something like this could be done in the platform
driver:

	for (i = 0; i < NUM_SI5338_CHIPS; i++) {
	     adap = i2c_get_adapter(private->i2c_adp->nr + 1 + i);
	     private->i2c_client[i] = i2c_new_device_unregistered(adap,
	     				&si5338_info[i], i2c_si5338_addr);
	     clkdev_create(clk, NULL, dev_name(private->i2c_client[i]->dev));
	     device_register(private->i2c_client[i]->dev);
	}

Then in the si5338 driver we call devm_clk_get(i2c->dev, NULL)
and we get the xtal clock.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-20  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-09 17:09 [Resend Patch v6] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338 York Sun
2015-10-10  0:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-16 21:01   ` York Sun
2015-10-16 21:31     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-16 21:37       ` York Sun
2015-10-16 23:05         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-17  0:09           ` York Sun
2015-10-19 20:34           ` York Sun
2015-10-20  0:03             ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-20  0:17               ` York Sun
2015-10-20  0:36                 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-10-20  1:28                   ` York Sun
2015-10-20 17:20                     ` York Sun
2015-10-20 17:49                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-21  0:25                       ` York Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151020003604.GF19782@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=andrey@elphel.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=pmarrecas@outlook.com \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=yorksun@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.