From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 4/4] README.bisection: New
 consumer-oriented document
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:20:05 +0100
Message-ID: <20151020092005.GA27732@zion.uk.xensource.com>
References: <1445271335-21792-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
	<1445271335-21792-4-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
	<20151019163527.GP28665@zion.uk.xensource.com>
	<22053.8077.174953.347128@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=7282924f4=wei.liu2@citrix.com>)
	id 1ZoT5V-0001k4-AR
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:09 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <22053.8077.174953.347128@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:51:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 4/4] README.bisection: New consumer-oriented document"):
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:15:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > +         |       url used for fetching the bits
> > > +	 |
> > > +         ` Identifier indicating the purpose for which the tree
> > > +	   is used.
> > 
> > A tab was inserted here.
> 
> Thanks, will fix.
> 
> > > +Progress Reports
> ...
> > > +These contain the roughly same information; instead of "complete" they
> > > +may say "running", "inconclusive", "unreproducible", etc.
> > 
> > On xen-devel there are only "complete" emails. It might be helpful to
> > send "unreproducible" and / or "inconclusive" emails as well? What I'm
> > thinking is that it would be helpful to clearly indicate human
> > intervention is needed.
> 
> There's quite a lot of these.  In principle, around one for each
> "REGR" ever mentioned in a main push gate flight report.
> 
> I don't think anyone wants to read them routinely.  I certainly don't.
> If one is interested in a particular failure, it's easy enough to go
> into the list and find the right one.
> 

OK then.

> Ian.