From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:00:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020140031.GG17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445326090-1698-3-git-send-email-daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 2280497..f534e15 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -2560,10 +2560,9 @@ static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> int do_sleep = 1;
> + DECLARE_SWAITQUEUE(wait);
>
> - DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> -
> - prepare_to_wait(&vc->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + prepare_to_swait(&vc->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> /*
> * Check one last time for pending exceptions and ceded state after
> @@ -2577,7 +2576,7 @@ static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
> }
>
> if (!do_sleep) {
> - finish_wait(&vc->wq, &wait);
> + finish_swait(&vc->wq, &wait);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -2585,7 +2584,7 @@ static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
> trace_kvmppc_vcore_blocked(vc, 0);
> spin_unlock(&vc->lock);
> schedule();
> - finish_wait(&vc->wq, &wait);
> + finish_swait(&vc->wq, &wait);
> spin_lock(&vc->lock);
> vc->vcore_state = VCORE_INACTIVE;
> trace_kvmppc_vcore_blocked(vc, 1);
This one looks buggy, one should _NOT_ assume that your blocking
condition is true after schedule().
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 8db1d93..45ab55f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2019,7 +2018,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
>
> for (;;) {
> - prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + prepare_to_swait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0)
> break;
> @@ -2028,7 +2027,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> schedule();
> }
>
> - finish_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
> + finish_swait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
> cur = ktime_get();
>
> out:
Should we not take this opportunity to get rid of these open-coded wait
loops?
Does this work?
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 13 ++-----------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 228049786888..b5b8bcad5105 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -2552,18 +2552,10 @@ static void kvmppc_wait_for_exec(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc,
finish_wait(&vcpu->arch.cpu_run, &wait);
}
-/*
- * All the vcpus in this vcore are idle, so wait for a decrementer
- * or external interrupt to one of the vcpus. vc->lock is held.
- */
-static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
+static inline bool kvmppc_vcore_should_sleep(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
- int do_sleep = 1;
-
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-
- prepare_to_wait(&vc->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ bool sleep = true;
/*
* Check one last time for pending exceptions and ceded state after
@@ -2571,26 +2563,35 @@ static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
*/
list_for_each_entry(vcpu, &vc->runnable_threads, arch.run_list) {
if (vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions || !vcpu->arch.ceded) {
- do_sleep = 0;
+ sleep = false;
break;
}
}
- if (!do_sleep) {
- finish_wait(&vc->wq, &wait);
- return;
- }
+ return sleep;
+}
+static inline void kvmppc_vcore_schedule(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
+{
vc->vcore_state = VCORE_SLEEPING;
trace_kvmppc_vcore_blocked(vc, 0);
spin_unlock(&vc->lock);
schedule();
- finish_wait(&vc->wq, &wait);
spin_lock(&vc->lock);
vc->vcore_state = VCORE_INACTIVE;
trace_kvmppc_vcore_blocked(vc, 1);
}
+/*
+ * All the vcpus in this vcore are idle, so wait for a decrementer
+ * or external interrupt to one of the vcpus. vc->lock is held.
+ */
+static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
+{
+ ___wait_event(vc->wq, !kvmppc_vcore_should_sleep(vc), TASK_IDLE, 0, 0,
+ kvmppc_vcore_schedule(vc));
+}
+
static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int n_ceded;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 8db1d9361993..488f00d79059 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1996,7 +1996,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
ktime_t start, cur;
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
bool waited = false;
u64 block_ns;
@@ -2018,17 +2017,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
} while (single_task_running() && ktime_before(cur, stop));
}
- for (;;) {
- prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ ___wait_event(vcpu->wq, kvm_cpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0, TASK_IDLE, 0, 0,
+ waited = true; schedule());
- if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0)
- break;
-
- waited = true;
- schedule();
- }
-
- finish_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
cur = ktime_get();
out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 7:28 [PATCH v3 0/4] Simple wait queue support Daniel Wagner
2015-10-20 7:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait) implementation Daniel Wagner
2015-10-26 12:04 ` Boqun Feng
2015-10-26 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-26 12:59 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-10-26 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-26 14:19 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-04 10:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-04 12:12 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-11-18 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-18 15:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 7:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq Daniel Wagner
2015-10-20 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-20 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-10-20 15:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-20 16:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-21 8:55 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-10-21 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-21 9:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-10-21 9:24 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-10-21 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-23 11:51 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-10-20 7:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] rcu: Do not call rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() while holding rnp->lock Daniel Wagner
2015-10-20 7:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] rcu: use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree Daniel Wagner
2015-10-25 20:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Simple wait queue support Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-26 6:34 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151020140031.GG17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.