From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sowmini Varadhan Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu-common: fix return type of iommu_tbl_range_alloc() Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:56:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20151021195640.GC14667@oracle.com> References: <55FBD36C.5070301@arm.com> <1442567375-6963-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Andre Przywara , Joerg Roedel , "David S. Miller" , sparclinux , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Parisc List , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On (10/21/15 21:12), Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Does this function really need to return DMA_ERROR_CODE in case of > failure? fwiw, this came up very early in code review: http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparc&m=142613044704833&w=2 --Sowmini From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sowmini Varadhan Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:56:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu-common: fix return type of iommu_tbl_range_alloc() Message-Id: <20151021195640.GC14667@oracle.com> List-Id: References: <55FBD36C.5070301@arm.com> <1442567375-6963-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On (10/21/15 21:12), Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Does this function really need to return DMA_ERROR_CODE in case of > failure? fwiw, this came up very early in code review: http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparc&m2613044704833&w=2 --Sowmini From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com (Sowmini Varadhan) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:56:40 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] iommu-common: fix return type of iommu_tbl_range_alloc() In-Reply-To: References: <55FBD36C.5070301@arm.com> <1442567375-6963-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Message-ID: <20151021195640.GC14667@oracle.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On (10/21/15 21:12), Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Does this function really need to return DMA_ERROR_CODE in case of > failure? fwiw, this came up very early in code review: http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparc&m=142613044704833&w=2 --Sowmini