From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, thaller@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: try harder to not reuse ifindex when moving interfaces
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:00:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151022170100.1e45a8b8@griffin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5628F81D.1070009@6wind.com>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:52:13 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> With the proposed scenario:
> 1. create netns 'new_netns'
> 2. in root netns, move the interface with ifindex 2 to new_netns
> 3. in new_netns, delete the interface with ifindex 2
> 4. in new_netns, create an interface - it will get ifindex 2
>
> Operation 2 and 4 are done by dev_change_net_namespace() under rtnl_lock().
> RTM_DELLINK(root netns) and RTM_NEWLINK(new_netns) are sent by this function.
> It means that operation 3 has been done before and that RTM_DELLINK(new_netns)
> has been sent before.
Imagine the application trying to configure the interface with ifindex 2
after your step 2. It constructs a netlink message and sends it to the
kernel; but while doing so, steps 3 and 4 happen. Now the application
ends up configuring a different interface than it intended to. After
that, it polls the netlink socket and receives the notifications about
interface disappearing and a new one appearing.
I don't see any way the user space application can prevent this. There
will always be a race between receiving netlink notifications and
sending config requests.
I guess Thomas Haller can elaborate more as he ran into this.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-16 11:07 [PATCH net] net: try harder to not reuse ifindex when moving interfaces Jiri Benc
2015-10-18 15:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-19 9:06 ` Jiri Benc
2015-10-19 15:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-21 14:43 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 14:46 ` Jiri Benc
2015-10-21 15:32 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 15:25 ` Jiri Benc
2015-10-21 15:56 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 17:12 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-22 14:52 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-10-22 15:00 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2015-10-22 15:10 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-22 15:20 ` Thomas Haller
2015-10-22 15:23 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-10-22 16:45 ` Thomas Graf
2015-10-22 17:21 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-22 18:56 ` Thomas Graf
2015-10-23 10:40 ` Thomas Haller
2015-10-22 15:21 ` Thomas Haller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151022170100.1e45a8b8@griffin \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.