All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timer: Lazily wakup nohz CPU when adding new timer.
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:49:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151023021951.GP3897@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022214003.GA22993@jnakajim-build>

On 22-10-15, 14:40, Yunhong Jiang wrote:
> A naive question is, why it's sure a tick will happen when the tickless 
> processor is in idle?

How do you get this impression? I don't think anyone has said that.

We are talking about deferrable timers, which by design are only
required if the target CPU is not-idle. If it is idle, then the timer
isn't required to be serviced until the CPU wakes up. And the CPU can
take whatever time it wants to wake up again.

> Is it because scheduler load balance is sure to send a 
> tick to the processor in future?

No. We aren't expecting the CPU to wake up any time soon. Just ignore
the deferrable timer.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-23  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-28 18:48 [PATCH] timer: Lazily wakup nohz CPU when adding new timer Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-05 20:51 ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-11 18:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 22:47   ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-21 10:46     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-22 21:40       ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-23  2:19         ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-10-23 22:10           ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-24  3:20             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-26 16:26               ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-27 15:11       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-13 16:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151023021951.GP3897@ubuntu \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.