diff for duplicates of <20151023124257.GB27420@8bytes.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 9640072..fd58023 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:37:06PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
-> It's more than that — it's equivalent to the situation *with* the
+> It's more than that a?? it's equivalent to the situation *with* the
 > IOMMU.
 > 
 > Having a *separate* PASID which is the only PASID we can use for kernel
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ another story, and I think we need to be careful with that (or at least
 avoid that the driver writers need to care that much about it to prevent
 userspace from getting access to kernel memory).
 
-> You mean an inline function which checks for iommu->kernel_svm ∀ iommu?
+> You mean an inline function which checks for iommu->kernel_svm a?? iommu?
 > And does the equivalent for other IOMMUs? I wouldn't want IOMMU
 > -specific code in there; just a decision about whether to call the out
 > -of-line function.
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ also sounds like a good idea.
 
 	Joerg
 
-_______________________________________________
-iommu mailing list
-iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
-https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
+--
+To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
+the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
+see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
+Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 0d6b08b..15f544b 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,18 +5,17 @@
  "ref\01445596413.4113.175.camel@infradead.org\0"
  "ref\020151023110359.GA27420@8bytes.org\0"
  "ref\01445600226.4113.196.camel@infradead.org\0"
- "ref\01445600226.4113.196.camel-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "From\0Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Add IOTLB flush support for kernel addresses\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:42:58 +0200\0"
- "To\0David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>"
-  iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
- " Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "To\0David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-mm@kvack.org <linux-mm@kvack.org>"
+  iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
+ " Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:37:06PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:\n"
- "> It's more than that \342\200\224 it's equivalent to the situation *with* the\n"
+ "> It's more than that a?? it's equivalent to the situation *with* the\n"
  "> IOMMU.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Having a *separate* PASID which is the only PASID we can use for kernel\n"
@@ -43,7 +42,7 @@
  "avoid that the driver writers need to care that much about it to prevent\n"
  "userspace from getting access to kernel memory).\n"
  "\n"
- "> You mean an inline function which checks for iommu->kernel_svm \342\210\200 iommu?\n"
+ "> You mean an inline function which checks for iommu->kernel_svm a?? iommu?\n"
  "> And does the equivalent for other IOMMUs? I wouldn't want IOMMU\n"
  "> -specific code in there; just a decision about whether to call the out\n"
  "> -of-line function.\n"
@@ -59,9 +58,10 @@
  "\n"
  "\tJoerg\n"
  "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "iommu mailing list\n"
- "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n"
- https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n"
+ "the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,\n"
+ "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n"
+ "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>"
 
-ee4ce21552ed7f0bcae88652f8b10894af3415067ade604fa38d8930aa855440
+e78ac2f0f08fc40befc6e35e0416482fae86ec0e151d525beb4839f828a31a4c
