[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mmc: atmel: Implement proper private data

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 10:35:45 AM, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> Hi Marek,

Hi!

> On 24.10.15 01:29, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 12:59:14 AM, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> >> On 23.10.15 20:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Instead of passing just the register area as a private data, introduce
> >>> a proper struct atmel_mci_priv structure instead. This will become
> >>> useful in the subsequent patch, where we eliminate the global variable
> >>> from this driver.
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >> 
> >> Reveiwed-by: Andreas Bie?mann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
> >> 
> >>> ---
> >>> 
> >>>  drivers/mmc/gen_atmel_mci.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/gen_atmel_mci.c b/drivers/mmc/gen_atmel_mci.c
> >>> index 8b05fcd..abc77cc 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/gen_atmel_mci.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/gen_atmel_mci.c
> >>> 
> >>> @@ -425,7 +435,7 @@ int atmel_mci_init(void *regs)
> >>> 
> >>>  	cfg->b_max = CONFIG_SYS_MMC_MAX_BLK_COUNT;
> >>> 
> >>> -	mmc = mmc_create(cfg, regs);
> >>> +	mmc = mmc_create(cfg, priv);
> >>> 
> >>>  	if (mmc == NULL) {
> >>>  	
> >>>  		free(cfg);
> >> 
> >> We shouldn't free cfg here but priv, the rest looks sane to me. Eventual
> >> return -ENODEV on !mmc and adopt the following comment, we may leak priv
> >> now as there is no de-init.
> > 
> > Uh right, can you fix that while applying the patchset or do you want me
> > to repost ?
> 
> I'll fix it.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Marek Vasut