From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:21:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151025092142.GB4380@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562A474E.6040401@plumgrid.com>
* Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/15 5:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >So the bpf_perf_event_read() returns the count value, does this not also
> >mean that returning -EINVAL here is also 'wrong'?
> >
> >I mean, sure an actual count value that high is unlikely, but its still
> >a broken interface.
>
> Agree. that's not pretty interface. I wish I looked at it more carefully
> when it was introduced. Now it's too late to change.
So I really, really think eBPF needs to have an easy to use mechanism to phase out
old ABI components and introducing new (better) ones!
Then old crap can be de-emphasised and eventually removed, instead of having to
live with crap forever ...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-25 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-23 0:10 [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 2:21 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-23 2:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 3:47 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-23 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-23 14:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-25 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-10-25 16:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-26 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-26 12:54 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-26 21:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-27 4:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151025092142.GB4380@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=xiakaixu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.