From: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Unify slow/combinatorial test handling
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:55:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151026135507.GA2504@boom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151023124757.GR16848@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:47:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:58:45PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:42:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > Until now we've had no unified way to handle slow/combinatorial tests.
> > > Most of the time we don't want to run slow/combinatorial tests, so this
> > > should remain the default, but when we do want to run such tests,
> > > it has been handled differently in different tests.
> > >
> > > This patch adds a --with-slow-combinatorial command line option to
> > > igt_core, changes gem_concurrent_blit and kms_frontbuffer_tracking
> > > to use this instead of their own methods, and removes gem_concurrent_all
> > > in the process, since it's now unnecessary.
> >
> > I'm not going to remember the --with-slow-combinatorial option. How
> > about just --all, or --slow?
>
> Yeah, --all as a shorthand sounds good to me.
OK, will rename it to '--all'.
Kind regards, David
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-26 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-23 11:42 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Unify slow/combinatorial test handling David Weinehall
2015-10-23 11:42 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] Rename gem_concurren_all over gem_concurrent_blit David Weinehall
2015-10-23 14:32 ` Thomas Wood
2015-10-26 15:03 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-23 11:42 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] Unify handling of slow/combinatorial tests David Weinehall
2015-10-23 11:56 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-23 13:50 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-10-26 14:59 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-26 16:44 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-10-26 17:30 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-26 17:59 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-10-27 6:47 ` David Weinehall
2015-11-17 15:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-17 15:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-17 15:49 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-18 10:19 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-23 14:55 ` Thomas Wood
2015-10-26 15:28 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-26 16:28 ` Thomas Wood
2015-10-26 17:34 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-26 18:15 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-10-23 11:42 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] Remove gem_concurrent_all, since it is now superfluous David Weinehall
2015-10-23 11:58 ` [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Unify slow/combinatorial test handling Chris Wilson
2015-10-23 12:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-26 13:55 ` David Weinehall [this message]
2015-10-28 11:29 ` [PATCH i-g-t 0/3 v2] " David Weinehall
2015-10-28 11:29 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] Copy gem_concurrent_all to gem_concurrent_blit David Weinehall
2015-10-28 11:29 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] Unify handling of slow/combinatorial tests David Weinehall
2015-10-28 16:12 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-10-30 7:56 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-30 11:55 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-10-30 11:59 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-28 17:14 ` Thomas Wood
2015-10-30 7:44 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-28 11:29 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] Remove superfluous gem_concurrent_all.c David Weinehall
2015-10-30 13:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 0/3 v3] Unify slow/combinatorial test handling David Weinehall
2015-10-30 13:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3 v3] Copy gem_concurrent_all to gem_concurrent_blit David Weinehall
2015-10-30 13:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3 v3] Unify handling of slow/combinatorial tests David Weinehall
2015-10-30 13:52 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 11:00 ` David Weinehall
2015-10-30 13:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3 v3] Remove superfluous gem_concurrent_all.c David Weinehall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151026135507.GA2504@boom \
--to=david.weinehall@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.