From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.182.105.169 with SMTP id gn9csp1609845obb; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:53:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.197.216 with SMTP id k85mr48188398qkl.77.1445943207990; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o103si4101117qko.28.2015.10.27.03.53.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of drjones@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of drjones@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=drjones@redhat.com Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B16CC0AF7A3; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hawk.localdomain (ovpn-204-27.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.27]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9RArMwO020538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:53:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:53:22 +0100 From: Andrew Jones To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Peter Crosthwaite , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list Message-ID: <20151027105322.GA16832@hawk.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-TUID: +GxqUsPxJuIm On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > Hi; it's been suggested to me that it would be helpful to have a > qemu-arm mailing list, along the lines of the existing qemu-ppc > and qemu-block lists. The idea would be to get people to cc the > list with their ARM related patches, so it would mostly act as > a way for people to filter their mail to separate the ARM stuff > out from the qemu-devel firehose. (Everything should still be > cc'd to qemu-devel as well.) > > Any objections/opinions? FWIW, I like the idea. Although notmuch tag +qemu-arm -- tag:new \ and to:qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ and \( subject:arm or subject:aarch64 \) also seems to work pretty well for me. Thanks, drew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr1sh-0005J1-B8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:53:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr1se-0003Fj-1q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:53:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr1sd-0003FU-T5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:53:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:53:22 +0100 From: Andrew Jones Message-ID: <20151027105322.GA16832@hawk.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Peter Crosthwaite , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > Hi; it's been suggested to me that it would be helpful to have a > qemu-arm mailing list, along the lines of the existing qemu-ppc > and qemu-block lists. The idea would be to get people to cc the > list with their ARM related patches, so it would mostly act as > a way for people to filter their mail to separate the ARM stuff > out from the qemu-devel firehose. (Everything should still be > cc'd to qemu-devel as well.) > > Any objections/opinions? FWIW, I like the idea. Although notmuch tag +qemu-arm -- tag:new \ and to:qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ and \( subject:arm or subject:aarch64 \) also seems to work pretty well for me. Thanks, drew