From: Dustin Byford <dustin@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Gardner <gardner.ben@gmail.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ACPI: Can I use I2cSerialBus with a PCI I2C controller?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:11:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027211111.GA6011@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151023082054.GP1526@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Hi Mika,
On Fri Oct 23 11:20, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> You should either use proper _HID/_CID for the device or put "PRP0001"
> to the _HID and let the match happen with DT .compatible strings. I've
> attached a hack that I use locally.
I have a similar hack over here. I have a question though:
> The corresponding ASL fragment would look like:
>
>
> Device (AT24)
> {
> Name (_HID, "PRP0001")
>
> Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized) {
> Name (UBUF, ResourceTemplate () {
> I2cSerialBus (0x50, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
> AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.I2C6",
> 0x00, ResourceConsumer)
> })
> Return (UBUF)
> }
>
> Name (_DSD, Package () {
> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> Package () {
> Package () {"compatible", "atmel,24c02"},
The "c02" in 24c02 also indicates the size. I've always found it a
little awkward when you could have a compatible string that disagrees
with firmware properties. Should we do something about that?
For example, is the more generic string, "atmel,at24" better? I'm not
sure I like that approach in general, but it works well for the at24
devices. at25 does it the same way.
> Package () {"size", 256},
> Package () {"pagesize", 32},
> Package () {"abs-value", 1},
> },
> })
>
> Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
> {
> Return (0xF)
> }
> }
--Dustin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 19:47 ACPI: Can I use I2cSerialBus with a PCI I2C controller? Ben Gardner
2015-10-21 8:50 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-21 23:14 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-22 8:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-22 16:19 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-22 17:17 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-23 8:20 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-23 9:43 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-23 17:24 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-26 19:56 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-27 10:49 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-27 21:11 ` Dustin Byford [this message]
2015-10-28 9:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Ben Gardner
2015-11-02 10:25 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027211111.GA6011@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=dustin@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=gardner.ben@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.