From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Subject: Re: Wrong TCP Checkum computed by hardware
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:57:57 -0700
Message-ID: <20151028065757.GA4251@mhcomputing.net>
References: <9E9D668A-17B5-4047-85B3-13519F898467@inventum.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Padam Jeet Singh <padam.singh@inventum.net>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DE68D9F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:59:43 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9E9D668A-17B5-4047-85B3-13519F898467@inventum.net>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:20:22PM +0530, Padam Jeet Singh wrote:
> Any hint what could I be doing wrong here?

When this kind of stuff doesn't work it often will depend on the exact version 
of card, chip, etc. if there are any errata.

So you might want to collect the specifics of the board with lspci -v, 
ethtool, and pulling it out to check the chip and board revisions.

In addition check over the example apps and see how things work there compared 
with your own code. Often the DPDK interfaces are kind of complex and small 
pointer or mbuf manipulation mistakes can cause very odd results.

Matthew.