From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:17:42 +0900 Message-ID: <20151028081742.GC28319@sirena.org.uk> References: <2b87b162eabd1570ae2311e1ef8655acda72f678.1441972771.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <55F72C97.2030306@kernel.org> <20151016002243.GA23912@codeaurora.org> <20151016060227.GS19018@linux> <20151016191658.GA16437@codeaurora.org> <20151017041055.GZ19018@linux> <20151022163942.GX8232@sirena.org.uk> <20151027081917.GD5505@ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S96ff6o5osL9bGCL" Return-path: Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:38604 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752457AbbJ1ISI (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:18:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151027081917.GD5505@ubuntu> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Rafael Wysocki , nm@ti.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rob.herring@linaro.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , open list , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , "Rafael J. Wysocki" --S96ff6o5osL9bGCL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:49:17PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 23-10-15, 01:39, Mark Brown wrote: > > I'm not sure that's > > a place we want to end up just yet, I think it's safer to just have a > > little bit of code in the kernel that glues things together in the cases > > where this is needed. =20 > So you are effectively saying that we shouldn't go ahead with multi > regulator support in OPP library, right? Well, I think things like libraries for getting the data tables out of DT are fine but I'm not convinced that trying to avoid having any device specific code at all is sufficiently clear yet - as far as I know we're mostly looking at a fairly small subset of devices still and with things like sequencing in the mix it's a bit worrying to me to be putting it all into an ABI intended to be used with no knowledge of the platform. --S96ff6o5osL9bGCL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWMISiAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQYcgH/24LlU6dseeEMz1AU74SyTd0 QH5nNaaFyOv6MnH7NErBywc30bX4GhrfeG1H9QdDpKzm39f/wzOS+lsQmGLI0eYp R3RMeyg8ejtuMbz9KWAv0hZnXJWYm+dytYxyCobBXeQUeNFg/DeCXsIiW1jXzt2n 0iQzL6XDzWFEnHk33ITwuQDCcDDYMprrI/RF5lV8ay0Cp9pXu1wQNr1xYvOKs68i ZlZEn3cAvMAIO2O19wf80HyUpjWAi6BhkQjKwKfhb+RejytPIMZZavvHKdq8ipb3 f10eBRlo+AOc+mh6OtrGo6kypQ1WNPVlxrF7sDbXjJO2ygcW2l8ypeqnRnGQ9b4= =/J5O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S96ff6o5osL9bGCL--