From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <anton@samba.org>
Received: from hr2.samba.org (hr2.samba.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:192:486::147:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FED1A0B6F
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:12:13 +1100 (AEDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:11:49 +1100
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
 <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Michael
 Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] powerpc32: checksum_wrappers_64 becomes
 checksum_wrappers
Message-ID: <20151028221149.2febe8a6@kryten>
In-Reply-To: <1445570793.701.147.camel@freescale.com>
References: <cover.1442876807.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
 <91ebacbbd631ec02ad00e0a824b6cad0dac532a0.1442876807.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
 <1445570793.701.147.camel@freescale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Hi Scott,

> I wonder why it was 64-bit specific in the first place.

I think it was part of a series where I added my 64bit assembly checksum
routines, and I didn't step back and think that the wrapper code would
be useful on 32 bit.

Anton