All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@codeaurora.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Update task->on_rq when tasks are moving between runqueues
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:57:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151029005710.GA11285@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151025100924.GP2508@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 15-10-25 11:09:24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:01:02AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
> > Task->on_rq has three states:
> > 	0 - Task is not on runqueue (rq)
> > 	1 (TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED) - Task is on rq
> > 	2 (TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) - Task is on rq but in the process of being
> > 	migrated to another rq
> > 
> > When a task is moving between rqs task->on_rq state should be
> > TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING
> 
> Only when not holding both rq locks..

IMHO I think we should keep the state of p->on_rq updated with the correct state
all the time unless I am incorrect in what p->on_rq represent. The task
is moving between rq's and is on the rq so the state should be
TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING right? I do realize that the code is currently not
broken. However, in the future someone might come along and change
set_task_cpu() and the code change might rely on an accurate p->on_rq value. It
would be good design to keep this value correct.

Thanks,

-- 
.Olav

The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-29  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-24 18:01 [PATCH] sched: Update task->on_rq when tasks are moving between runqueues Olav Haugan
2015-10-25 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-29  0:57   ` Olav Haugan [this message]
2015-10-29  1:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 20:40       ` Paul Turner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151029005710.GA11285@codeaurora.org \
    --to=ohaugan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.