From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1030704AbbJ3LIn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:08:43 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:12642 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1030334AbbJ3LIk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:08:40 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,217,1444719600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="590953833"
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:08:34 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        keyrings@vger.kernel.org, chris.j.arges@canonical.com,
        seth.forshee@canonical.com, colin.king@canonical.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, David Safford <safford@us.ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] keys, trusted: update documentation for 'hash='
 option
Message-ID: <20151030110834.GA29725@intel.com>
References: <1446134370-11460-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <1446134370-11460-5-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <1446146762.13911.3.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1446146762.13911.3.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:26:02PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 17:59 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Documented 'hash=' option.
> 
> No reason for a separate patch.  Please squash this patch with the one
> that introduced the new option.

Right. I'm going to do this and also swapping the order of patches (from
"1.  tpm 2. trusted" to "1. trusted 2. tpm") so that they can be tested
separately (and thereby also moving change to trusted_key_option to
"trusted" patch).

> Mimi

/Jarkko