From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix RSM into 64-bit protected mode, round 2
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:40:49 +0100
Message-ID: <20151030154049.GA18626@potion.brq.redhat.com>
References: <1445636635-32260-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com>
 <20151026153715.GA31158@potion.brq.redhat.com>
 <562E4A1D.7000900@redhat.com>
 <562E5593.10408@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <562E5593.10408@redhat.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

2015-10-26 17:32+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 26/10/2015 16:43, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> The code would be cleaner if we had a different approach, but this works
>>> too and is safer for stable. In case you prefer to leave the rewrite for
>>> a future victim,
>> 
>> It's hard to express how much I prefer that.
> 
> Radim, if you want to have a try go ahead since I cannot apply the patch
> until next Monday.

The future I originally had in mind was more hoverboardy, but a series
just landed, "KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode".

Laszlo, I'd be grateful if you could check that it works.