From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb:ci_udc: Remove ULPI setting for i.MX OTG controller
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:10:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201511050610.17880.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446693458-31888-1-git-send-email-B37916@freescale.com>
On Thursday, November 05, 2015 at 04:17:38 AM, Ye.Li wrote:
> All the i.MX6, i.MX23 and i.MX28 OTG controllers only support UTMI
> interface. Set to ULPI is not correct, even the controller will reject
> this
> setting in PORTSC register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye.Li <B37916@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c | 12 ------------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c
> index 1ba5054..cb35982 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c
> @@ -1018,18 +1018,6 @@ int usb_gadget_register_driver(struct
> usb_gadget_driver *driver) return ret;
>
> ret = ci_udc_probe();
You're now dropping the error handling for this function, that's really not
good, so I cannot accept the patch. But the current error handling looks
totally broken. So the solution I would propose here is to fix the error
handling for ci_udc_probe() here instead of outright removing the code. What
do you think ?
> -#if defined(CONFIG_USB_EHCI_MX6) || defined(CONFIG_USB_EHCI_MXS)
> - /*
> - * FIXME: usb_lowlevel_init()->ehci_hcd_init() should be doing all
> - * HW-specific initialization, e.g. ULPI-vs-UTMI PHY selection
> - */
> - if (!ret) {
> - struct ci_udc *udc = (struct ci_udc *)controller.ctrl->hcor;
> -
> - /* select ULPI phy */
> - writel(PTS(PTS_ENABLE) | PFSC, &udc->portsc);
> - }
> -#endif
>
> ret = driver->bind(&controller.gadget);
> if (ret) {
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 3:17 [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb:ci_udc: Remove ULPI setting for i.MX OTG controller Ye.Li
2015-11-05 5:10 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-11-09 7:58 ` Li Ye-B37916
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201511050610.17880.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.