From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dts: twl4030: Add iio properties for bci subnode" Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 03:44:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20151107024457.GA18676@earth> References: <1446826430-3705-1-git-send-email-sre@kernel.org> <20151107091925.7dcd14a7@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6350227625245360941==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151107091925.7dcd14a7@canb.auug.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Kevin Hilman , Tony Lindgren , Tyler Baker , Felipe Balbi , Olof Johansson , Marek Belisko , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --===============6350227625245360941== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 09:19:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:36:34 -0800 Kevin Hilman wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrot= e: > > > This reverts commit af19161aaed7ff8d1a52b2e517460f2fa0774e32, > > > which breaks the omap3 device tree build due to a wrong reference. > > > > > > I accidently queued this change via the power supply subsystem while > > > telling Marek at the same time, that it should go through Tony's tree. > > > Following that I did miss Stephen's messages about the build failure = in > > > linux-next and since he switched to merging an older snapshot nobody > > > else noticed the problem in my tree. I didn't notice myself, since I > > > did not build any device tree files assuming none have changed by me. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel =20 > >=20 > > We also found this in kernelci.org build testing, and verified that > > this fixes the build. > >=20 > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman > >=20 > > Thanks Felipe for reporting, and thanks Sebastian for the quick fix. >=20 > I think "quick fix" is a bit rich. I reported this to Sebastian on > Sept 29, Oct 2 , Oct 8, Oct 16, and Oct 21. Yes, I did see them after searching for them. My filter rules put your mails together with the LKML mails (which I usually skip over quite fast), so I did not notice the first one. Since the follow up mails were in the same thread as the one(s) previously marked as dont-care, I didn't notice them either. > The only response I got was from Marek Belisko on Oct 8 and 21. I > have been using the battery tree (git://git.infradead.org/battery-2.6.git= #master) > from Sept 25, so none of the commits after that have been in any linux-ne= xt > release. > > Yes, I am a little annoyed. Sorry :( > Do people have trouble receiving my emails? I did create two extra rules for your mails directly after preparing the revert, so I hope it won't happen again. On Sat, Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:36:25 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > I don't think the problem was not getting your emails, looks like the > problem was a major disconnect between what was sent to Linus and what > was in -next. :( Is there an easy way to check this, so that I can create a cronjob checkin it? Having an additional automatic "your tree differs from linux-next" would be helpful, since that would make me search for the problem/a mail from Stephen. -- Sebastian --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWPWWjAAoJENju1/PIO/qa7nAQAId59kZTxwC5AkvBjaeig7xZ 8837Y8Ruxq9BmPMwlrb8biKDMuB09WbNdQQ6wGpuEsLtreqXkmVOgwN0vEwe/ZrT zwKcgVMIauiqP5badIzKriBnR+i/bV4BBi2lrwQHrTNdeaM78WDG1MTDgQ0PiTNw N8USO+5z5CwUhhbqeeIoCv/IN4dqgAAEMS08RKgacGkS6Ckk/ixxiRXnGWzvwGFb m70y5E7PtiQyOhh/Dp3DlJCwy0AHF5K842m9a6yTOhgHHRQbdEBkRIaINctyDN0R O4lYRw9BxDu9CXAi2md6WhFrfeIteNy8n8PC5H6debJlYOQbGLh3FSom1BZIZYWx 3FpNW17KDJSzP70JXgUE/WxinwVEFs0SQkYTJZJBiQwvMgB39Bpzc0xy9A9DhlZc 85KfEsnKZs2OIcWdJgvCtjyjn6DqTkCAHw0MaKl20e7h9xOK5IwrYehjCuDTMUwn +5oYInqp3aYJqQvKMoT973anAQtYlafa0NcP9Qsl31CualaY7ciodcH5WNNU9Xni 3AXC/i3xj5bjnXJ9Y+sIa+iDh19jO08ms7erROpIoN0n1towmmt/ARtAg9epjekg AYleQZhiLJihg9isFD2iPs2gkpIuBYQc5glH6KlhUHjNq2LfYwQmbry8Zw/blNHP /HfAcY1Y1JDMu7qlctdI =Fepb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- --===============6350227625245360941== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============6350227625245360941==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sre@kernel.org (Sebastian Reichel) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 03:44:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dts: twl4030: Add iio properties for bci subnode" In-Reply-To: <20151107091925.7dcd14a7@canb.auug.org.au> References: <1446826430-3705-1-git-send-email-sre@kernel.org> <20151107091925.7dcd14a7@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: <20151107024457.GA18676@earth> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 09:19:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:36:34 -0800 Kevin Hilman wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > This reverts commit af19161aaed7ff8d1a52b2e517460f2fa0774e32, > > > which breaks the omap3 device tree build due to a wrong reference. > > > > > > I accidently queued this change via the power supply subsystem while > > > telling Marek at the same time, that it should go through Tony's tree. > > > Following that I did miss Stephen's messages about the build failure in > > > linux-next and since he switched to merging an older snapshot nobody > > > else noticed the problem in my tree. I didn't notice myself, since I > > > did not build any device tree files assuming none have changed by me. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel > > > > We also found this in kernelci.org build testing, and verified that > > this fixes the build. > > > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman > > > > Thanks Felipe for reporting, and thanks Sebastian for the quick fix. > > I think "quick fix" is a bit rich. I reported this to Sebastian on > Sept 29, Oct 2 , Oct 8, Oct 16, and Oct 21. Yes, I did see them after searching for them. My filter rules put your mails together with the LKML mails (which I usually skip over quite fast), so I did not notice the first one. Since the follow up mails were in the same thread as the one(s) previously marked as dont-care, I didn't notice them either. > The only response I got was from Marek Belisko on Oct 8 and 21. I > have been using the battery tree (git://git.infradead.org/battery-2.6.git#master) > from Sept 25, so none of the commits after that have been in any linux-next > release. > > Yes, I am a little annoyed. Sorry :( > Do people have trouble receiving my emails? I did create two extra rules for your mails directly after preparing the revert, so I hope it won't happen again. On Sat, Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:36:25 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > I don't think the problem was not getting your emails, looks like the > problem was a major disconnect between what was sent to Linus and what > was in -next. :( Is there an easy way to check this, so that I can create a cronjob checkin it? Having an additional automatic "your tree differs from linux-next" would be helpful, since that would make me search for the problem/a mail from Stephen. -- Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: