All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:30:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151110083042.GS31308@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1511091603240.26497@east.gentwo.org>

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:04:51PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> 
> > I think it must be &object
> >
> > BTW why is object defined as void **? I suspect we can safely drop one
> > star.
> 
> See get_freepointer()
> 
> static inline void *get_freepointer(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> {
>         return *(void **)(object + s->offset);
> }

In this function object has type (void *)

> 
> The object at some point has a freepointer and ** allows the use of the
> s->offset field to get to it.

But it doesn't mean we have to define it as (void **) in
slab_alloc_node. Actually, the fact that object is of type (void **) is
never used in slab_alloc_node, and all functions called by it accept
(void *) for object, not (void **). Dropping one star there doesn't
break anything and looks less confusing IMO.

Thanks,
Vladimir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-05 15:37 [PATCH V2 0/2] SLUB bulk API interactions with kmem cgroup Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 15:37 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 16:18   ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 16:40     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 15:38 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] slub: add missing kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 16:25   ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 16:53     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-07 20:25       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 20:55         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-09 16:39         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 18:38           ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-05 16:10 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] SLUB bulk API interactions with kmem cgroup Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 18:16   ` [PATCH V3 " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 18:17     ` [PATCH V3 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 19:13       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 20:25         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-10  8:46           ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-10 15:55             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-10 16:17               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-10 18:32               ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-11 15:28                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-11 18:30                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-11 18:56                     ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-12 14:27                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 22:04         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-10  8:30           ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2015-11-10 15:23             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-09 18:17     ` [PATCH V3 2/2] slub: add missing kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 18:56       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-13 10:57   ` [PATCH V4 0/2] SLUB bulk API interactions with kmem cgroup Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-13 10:57     ` [PATCH V4 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-14 11:04       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-13 10:57     ` [PATCH V4 2/2] slub: add missing kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151110083042.GS31308@esperanza \
    --to=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.