diff for duplicates of <20151110121912.GA17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index da1bd03..9b3663d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:27:33AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > arm64, where I am about to introduce asm/paravirt.h and stolen time > > > support, without #include <asm/paravirt.h> in cputime.c I would get: > > > -> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function ?steal_account_process_tick?: -> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c:260:24: error: ?paravirt_steal_enabled? undeclared (first use in this function) +> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function ‘steal_account_process_tick’: +> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c:260:24: error: ‘paravirt_steal_enabled’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > > if (static_key_false(¶virt_steal_enabled)) { > > > > > > A bit of digging on x86 (using gcc -E on cputime.c) tells me that diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index f59465c..cbe5770 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,10 +4,22 @@ "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.02.1511051659580.13541@kaball.uk.xensource.com\0" "ref\020151109173619.GW3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net\0" "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101127090.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com\0" - "From\0peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v11 2/5] missing include asm/paravirt.h in cputime.c\0" + "From\0Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] missing include asm/paravirt.h in cputime.c\0" "Date\0Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:19:12 +0100\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>\0" + "Cc\0xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + konrad.wilk@oracle.com + marc.zyngier@arm.com + will.deacon@arm.com + Ian.Campbell@citrix.com + linux@arm.linux.org.uk + olof@lixom.net + arnd@arndb.de + catalin.marinas@arm.com + " mingo@redhat.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:27:33AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:\n" @@ -26,8 +38,8 @@ "> > > arm64, where I am about to introduce asm/paravirt.h and stolen time\n" "> > > support, without #include <asm/paravirt.h> in cputime.c I would get:\n" "> > > \n" - "> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function ?steal_account_process_tick?:\n" - "> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c:260:24: error: ?paravirt_steal_enabled? undeclared (first use in this function)\n" + "> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function \342\200\230steal_account_process_tick\342\200\231:\n" + "> > > kernel/sched/cputime.c:260:24: error: \342\200\230paravirt_steal_enabled\342\200\231 undeclared (first use in this function)\n" "> > > if (static_key_false(¶virt_steal_enabled)) {\n" "> > > \n" "> > > A bit of digging on x86 (using gcc -E on cputime.c) tells me that\n" @@ -53,4 +65,4 @@ "\n" Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> -30506d11e3ce9d23a6cff06fb714156a795e1933acbd121cad9bf49e52b2d7eb +67bad6274e6e2f531e221d709074b1f49e38b0c9ad88b450eadf42e310e4c890
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.