From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw8E2-0008Jh-LY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:40:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw8Dy-00034i-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:40:38 -0500 Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.146]:43979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw8Dy-00033Z-1y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:40:34 -0500 Received: from localhost by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:40:31 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F972CE8052 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:40:28 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id tAACe53036634768 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:40:13 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id tAACdto4012621 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:39:56 +1100 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:09:33 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Message-ID: <20151110123933.GA8664@in.ibm.com> References: <1447082260-427-1-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5640BBAA.1000201@suse.de> <5640BD5B.9050204@de.ibm.com> <5640BDD2.9040102@de.ibm.com> <5640C210.5060804@suse.de> <5640FC4B.600@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5640FC4B.600@de.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] s390: Allow hotplug of s390 CPUs Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Matthew Rosato , Eduardo Habkost , agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , rth@twiddle.net On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:04:27PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > Bharata did implement device_add for pseries, I thought. Yes. For pseries, my patchset did CPU hotplug via device_add and device_del commands. And that's what I am planning to stick to going forward. > > Seems that the patches did not make it into upstream yet. > Bharata, is cpu hotplug on pseries still missing? Yes, the last version I posted is at https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg00650.html Andreas mentioned that he would like to see some generic changes for supporting device_add for CPU, socket vs core level hotplug, defining the semantics etc. There was some discussion towards that and this is last I heard about it: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-10/msg05347.html Regards, Bharata.