From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: fix locking in handle_stripe_clean_event()
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:58:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111155859.GE8684@ares> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446803687-6756-1-git-send-email-klamm@yandex-team.ru>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:54:47PM +0300, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> commit b8a9d66d043ffac116100775a469f05f5158c16f upstream.
>
Thanks, I'll use this backport for the 3.16 kernel as well.
Cheers,
--
Lu�s
> After commit 566c09c53455 ("raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()")
> __find_stripe() is called under conf->hash_locks + hash.
> But handle_stripe_clean_event() calls remove_hash() under
> conf->device_lock.
>
> Under some cirscumstances the hash chain can be circuited,
> and we get an infinite loop with disabled interrupts and locked hash
> lock in __find_stripe(). This leads to hard lockup on multiple CPUs
> and following system crash.
>
> I was able to reproduce this behavior on raid6 over 6 ssd disks.
> The devices_handle_discard_safely option should be set to enable trim
> support. The following script was used:
>
> for i in `seq 1 32`; do
> dd if=/dev/zero of=large$i bs=10M count=100 &
> done
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
> Fixes: 566c09c53455 ("raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()")
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13 - 4.2
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index b98c70e..1c829a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -3029,6 +3029,8 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,
> }
> if (!discard_pending &&
> test_bit(R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags)) {
> + int hash = sh->hash_lock_index;
> +
> clear_bit(R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);
> clear_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);
> if (sh->qd_idx >= 0) {
> @@ -3042,9 +3044,9 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,
> * no updated data, so remove it from hash list and the stripe
> * will be reinitialized
> */
> - spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> + spin_lock_irq(conf->hash_locks + hash);
> remove_hash(sh);
> - spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(conf->hash_locks + hash);
> if (test_bit(STRIPE_SYNC_REQUESTED, &sh->state))
> set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-06 6:41 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] md/raid5: fix locking in handle_stripe_clean_event()" failed to apply to 3.14-stable tree gregkh
2015-11-06 9:54 ` [PATCH] md/raid5: fix locking in handle_stripe_clean_event() Roman Gushchin
2015-11-11 15:58 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-28 8:52 Roman Gushchin
2015-10-28 8:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2015-10-29 0:34 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-29 0:34 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-29 14:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2015-10-29 14:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2015-10-29 21:22 ` Greg KH
2015-10-29 21:22 ` Greg KH
2015-10-30 1:35 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-30 1:35 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-30 14:02 ` Roman Gushchin
2015-10-30 16:25 ` Shaohua Li
2015-10-30 22:16 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-30 22:16 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-31 12:25 ` Roman Gushchin
2015-10-31 12:25 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151111155859.GE8684@ares \
--to=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=klamm@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.