From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZwoC8-0000VC-Af for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:29:29 +0000 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so23096464wmv.1 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:29:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:29:03 +0100 From: LABBE Corentin To: Joachim Eastwood Cc: Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , josh.wu@atmel.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: atmel_nand: fix a possible NULL dereference Message-ID: <20151112092903.GB9850@Red> References: <1447314579-31374-1-git-send-email-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:29:57AM +0100, Joachim Eastwood wrote: > On 12 November 2015 at 08:49, LABBE Corentin wrote: > > of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer > > dereference later. > > > > Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin > > --- > > drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > > index 475c938..f3cf68b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > > @@ -1495,9 +1495,12 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > > int ecc_mode; > > struct atmel_nand_data *board = &host->board; > > enum of_gpio_flags flags = 0; > > + const struct of_device_id *of_id; > > > > - host->caps = (struct atmel_nand_caps *) > > - of_match_device(atmel_nand_dt_ids, host->dev)->data; > > + of_id = of_match_device(atmel_nand_dt_ids, host->dev); > > + if (!of_id) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + host->caps = of_id->data; > > It might be cleaner to use of_device_get_match_data() here. > I agree, I will resend shortly with it. And this time, I wont forgot the patch which permit to supress the kbuild_robot warning. Regards LABBE Corentin