From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>,
lizefan 00213767 <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:23:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151119102300.GA2830@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564D6FF9.3030105@huawei.com>
* Wangnan (F) <wangnan0@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/11/19 14:37, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >* Wangnan (F) <wangnan0@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>perf cmdline is
> >>>
> >>># ./pref record -g -F 9 --call-graph dwarf ./test_dwarf_unwind
> >>>
> >>>Use default events, precise_ip == 2 so uses PEBS.
> >>>
> >>Testetd 'cycles', 'cycles:p' and 'cycles:pp'. Only 'cycles:pp' captures
> >>sample at callq. So maybe a PEBS problem?
> >Well, that's how our PEBS sampling works: we roll back the instruction pointer to
> >point at the instruction generating the sample. The state itself is
> >post-instruction.
>
> Just for curiosity:
>
> how the interrupted process continue to execute, when the PC
> saved in pt_regs still pointed to 'callq' but SP and stack has
> already changes? Do we fix it in kernel, or by hardware?
PEBS is an asynchronous hardware tracing mechanism, when batched PEBS is used it
might not even result in any interruption of execution. The 'pt_regs' does not
necessarily correspond to an interrupted, restartable context - we take the RIP
from the PEBS machinery and also use LBR and disassembly to determine the previous
instruction, before reporting it to user-space.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 7:20 [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18 8:00 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18 8:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-18 8:42 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18 8:49 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 6:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-19 6:45 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-11-19 10:43 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-19 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-27 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-30 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-01 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-01 16:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-18 8:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-18 9:02 ` Wangnan (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151119102300.GA2830@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.