From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: olivier@sobrie.be
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: re: can: kvaser_usb: Add support for Kvaser CAN/USB devices
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:42:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151119124219.GC2638@mwanda> (raw)
Hello Olivier Sobrie,
The patch 080f40a6fa28: "can: kvaser_usb: Add support for Kvaser
CAN/USB devices" from Nov 21, 2012, leads to the following static
checker warning:
drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb.c:949 kvaser_usb_rx_error()
0x08 | 0x18 has 0x08 set on both sides
drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb.c
941 switch (dev->family) {
942 case KVASER_LEAF:
943 if (es->leaf.error_factor) {
944 cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_BUSERROR | CAN_ERR_PROT;
945
946 if (es->leaf.error_factor & M16C_EF_ACKE)
947 cf->data[3] |= (CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_ACK);
948 if (es->leaf.error_factor & M16C_EF_CRCE)
949 cf->data[3] |= (CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ |
950 CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_DEL);
CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ is 0x08
CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_DEL is 0x18
It's weird that the bits overlap. Was that intentional? Why isn't it
enough to just say?:
cf->data[3] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_DEL;
The static checker complains about most places where
CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ is used. I see us setting the flag but not I
don't see where we test for this so I'm not sure.
951 if (es->leaf.error_factor & M16C_EF_FORME)
952 cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM;
953 if (es->leaf.error_factor & M16C_EF_STFE)
954 cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF;
955 if (es->leaf.error_factor & M16C_EF_BITE0)
956 cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT0;
957 if (es->leaf.error_factor & M16C_EF_BITE1)
958 cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT1;
959 if (es->leaf.error_factor & M16C_EF_TRE)
960 cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_TX;
961 }
962 break;
963 case KVASER_USBCAN:
regards,
dan carpenter
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-19 12:42 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-11-19 13:23 ` can: kvaser_usb: Add support for Kvaser CAN/USB devices Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-11-19 13:46 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-11-20 8:19 ` Olivier Sobrie
2015-11-20 11:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-21 12:40 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-11-21 13:39 ` Olivier Sobrie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151119124219.GC2638@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olivier@sobrie.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.