From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: allow queues the chance to quiesce after freezing them
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:53:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151119215311.GA19302@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151119214156.GA22690@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015@09:41:57PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015@12:11:52PM -0700, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > A panic was discovered while doing io and hitting the sysfs reset.
> > Because io was completing successfully, the nvme_dev_shutdown code
> > detected this non-idle state as a stuck state and started to tear down
> > the queues. This resulted in a paging error when nvme_process_cq wrote
> > the doorbell of a deleted queue.
> >
> > This patch allows some time after starting the queue freeze for queues
> > to quiesce on their own. It also sets a new nvme_queue member, frozen,
> > to prevent writing of the cq doorbell. If the queues successfully
> > quiesce, nvme_process_cq will run upon resuming. If the queues don't
> > quiesce, existing code considers it a dead controller and is torn down.
>
> I think all we really want is skip notifying completions on a
> "suspended" queue. We can tell by the value of the cq-vector,
> and it's already lock protected.
>
> It also sounds like we need to poll the cq after the delete completes
> to catch successful completions before we force cancel the rest.
>
> This appears to work for me. Does it pass your test?
This looks reasonable. I ran into stray ->q_db derference a lot during
reset testing, but after my abort and reset rewrites ([1] for th latest
version) I couldn't reproduce it any more.
[1]
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/nvme-req.8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-19 19:11 [PATCH] nvme: allow queues the chance to quiesce after freezing them Jon Derrick
2015-11-19 20:53 ` Jon Derrick
2015-11-19 21:41 ` Keith Busch
2015-11-19 21:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-11-19 22:20 ` Keith Busch
2015-11-19 22:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-19 22:12 ` Jon Derrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151119215311.GA19302@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.