From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:45:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> References: <1436214373-12969-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com> <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com> <201510122225.12786@pali> <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali> <20151105114041.GC27908@pali> <20151105161756.GG3078@atomide.com> <5643E716.9080204@gmail.com> <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Frank Rowand , Tony Lindgren , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Laura Abbott , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Will Deacon , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > Adding devicetree list. > >=20 > > Thread starts at > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354= 459.html > >=20 > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [151105 03:41]: > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Roh=C3=A1r wrote: > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>> * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [151012 13:29]: > > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comment= s > > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much a= gree > > >>>>>> what needs to be done. > >=20 > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this seri= es. > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transpo= rt > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). >=20 > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? >=20 > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > Pavel Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and discarded. --=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?=) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:45:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry In-Reply-To: <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> References: <1436214373-12969-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com> <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com> <201510122225.12786@pali> <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali> <20151105114041.GC27908@pali> <20151105161756.GG3078@atomide.com> <5643E716.9080204@gmail.com> <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> Message-ID: <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > Adding devicetree list. > > > > Thread starts at > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html > > > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Pali Roh?r [151105 03:41]: > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Roh?r wrote: > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>> * Pali Roh?r [151012 13:29]: > > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments > > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree > > >>>>>> what needs to be done. > > > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series. > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). > > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? > > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > Pavel Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and discarded. -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754249AbbKWOpv (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:45:51 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:35152 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752635AbbKWOpt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:45:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:45:45 +0100 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Pavel Machek Cc: Frank Rowand , Tony Lindgren , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Laura Abbott , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Will Deacon , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry Message-ID: <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> References: <1436214373-12969-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com> <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com> <201510122225.12786@pali> <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali> <20151105114041.GC27908@pali> <20151105161756.GG3078@atomide.com> <5643E716.9080204@gmail.com> <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > Adding devicetree list. > > > > Thread starts at > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html > > > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Pali Rohár [151105 03:41]: > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Rohár wrote: > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>> * Pali Rohár [151012 13:29]: > > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments > > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree > > >>>>>> what needs to be done. > > > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series. > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). > > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? > > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > Pavel Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and discarded. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com