Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: silence hugetlbfs warning under qtest

["Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 07:01:33PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Before: object-initial, chardev, qtest, object-late (not in the patch)
> >
> > After: chardev, qtest, object-initial, object-late (not in the patch)
> >
> > Objects must be initialized before chardev (except rng-egd) since in the
> > future chardev will need to use objects, in particular secret objects.
> > Was the swap intentional?
> 
> Yes, without the swap, qtest was not initialized before memory is allocated.
> 
> The alternative I could think of is to check the QTEST_QEMU_BINARY
> variable: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg01527.html

Why do we not simply delete the warning message about the path not
being on hugetlbfs ? ie, why does QEMU try to force a policy that
a memory-file backend has to be on hugetlbfs, as opposed to on
a plain tmpfs ?  I've previously had user request that we allow
use of plain tmpfs, because they want to use vhost-user without
also using hugepages, and that could be done with plain tmpfs.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|