From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1AOr-0000pl-1A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:00:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1AOn-0008Ru-1x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:00:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:00:14 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20151124100014.GA4296@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <1448245930-15031-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <565381E6.9010209@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565381E6.9010209@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotests: Add -nographic when starting QEMU in 119 and 120 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 23.11.2015 um 22:15 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 23.11.2015 03:32, Fam Zheng wrote: > > Otherwise, a window flashes on my desktop (built with SDL). Add this as > > other cases have it. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > >=20 > > --- > > v2: Fix 119 too. [Max] > > --- > > tests/qemu-iotests/119 | 2 +- > > tests/qemu-iotests/120 | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > Thanks, applied to my block-next tree: >=20 > https://github.com/XanClic/qemu/commits/block-next >=20 >=20 > (There are basically no reasons in favor of or against taking this in > for 2.5, so I decided in favor of =E2=80=9Cas few patches during freeze as > possible=E2=80=9D. If someone tries to convince me to take it in for 2.5,= I > won't have any objections.) It's clearly a bug fix, minimal diffstat, and as it's in the test suite not risky at all. Sounds like 2.5 to me. Kevin --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWVDUuAAoJEH8JsnLIjy/WDl0QAK6FbUCZ6vvDOTi7kDlfEPZh ccoYJsKtCZAWiMfP0xmR8mAvJoaTBDno82r8BvFoSci9ov9j4f6xsR6gqnKmnAH3 +3PV1D7fNhy164QhDhZBHkfdxOnWkQie2B9+Chzac+ZHc+vYSJw1GI+gbttdGWhF Q3Jax2Wtl4Ya8dBiNaypfMYQW1IpjX6KyEhqFyZuBY6RBi/H9Io7vFxgLwrzp0+Z km4uEB7nGJB09a23I33WX71wATTT7Bi809q2wqbubc0uNRqLosGo7szlmkiLkFGG 8/6bCsAtlS1DNCUmH1O0FsBgOfDwmoqClrSvuOpcF2FqIwIjUgMdeCOGIixRE1ZR q3V+hGkG1aK6bPK7+csNJ3shJ4cwPbH7WrwjhqSQ7+JQu6s0PJbQbIV9VzJXJ9Sq 4pWRiVEiWQoIwf85OZ7Iffw9Z1wQplYJvSBFoPhZFMSsYDHMW0x8Y9nFkx9WYjas Zn2sbseL3HZFsBkOtzphPjGw0tzTDWQXUQwCaIELcE4LmTExGDBfPvq1JFqV4OVt ylTUUeBUvPHxhb19o7LYtlrqRsUAF4TQdXtx6OD+/v2pzVYwTFSP5pK6b9JUzmod 6zwBoK/DQnTPC2UQKTHtQkGqyYoj/7I5LkzXcJCrnHbKTnN1YXGLKlxnUCAtbdMQ rs5mCp5H4DWFPBOORUsI =4MZT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--