From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] eeepc-wmi: Use acpi_dev_present Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:08:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20151124170819.GC30134@malice.jf.intel.com> References: <20151123190413.GU7413@malice.jf.intel.com> <1776557.hOTai0RnF7@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:43614 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256AbbKXRI0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:08:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1776557.hOTai0RnF7@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Lukas Wunner , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Corentin Chary On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:35:55PM +0100, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, November 23, 2015 11:04:13 AM Darren Hart wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > Use shiny new acpi_dev_present and remove all the boilerplate to search > > > for a particular ACPI device. No functional change. > > > > You did add a pr_warn, which is technically a functional change. Did you intend > > to leave that in? > > > > I have no objection for platform-drivers-x86, but please include all maintainers > > listed by get_maintainer.pl for the fastest response. > > > > +Rafael > > > > Rafael, I assume you will pick this up along with the acpi_dev_present ACPI > > change if you take that. Pleaes let me know if not. > > > > Otherwise, > > > > Acked-by: Darren Hart > > In fact, patch [1/5] as is needs to go in through upstream ACPICA, so I'm not > taking this series and please don't take it too. Ah, thanks, my mistake. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center