From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override - part 2
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:49:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124184957.GB27957@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447095627-12798-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:00:27PM +0100, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Commit 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node
> override") missed that the user provided node could also be negative.
> Handle this case as well to avoid out-of-bounds accesses to the
> node_states[] array. However, allow the special value -1, i.e.
> NUMA_NO_NODE, to be able to set the 'no specific node' configuration.
>
> Fixes: 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node...")
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
Applied as tweaked below to for-linus for v4.4, thanks! As written,
if NUMA_NO_NODE were defined as -2, we would incorrectly accept -1.
Let me know if you disagree with my fix.
> ---
> v2: allow NUMA_NO_NODE
>
> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 92618686604c..6e9818227b19 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,10 @@ static ssize_t numa_node_store(struct device *dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node))
> + if (node < NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(node))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
commit 2a35194c5a45fbb9ca1d88bc56804dfb51a75233
Author: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon Nov 9 20:00:27 2015 +0100
PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override
Commit 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node
override") missed that the user-provided node could also be negative.
Handle this case as well to avoid out-of-bounds accesses to the
node_states[] array. However, allow the special value -1, i.e.
NUMA_NO_NODE, to be able to set the 'no specific node' configuration.
[bhelgaas: remove assumption that NUMA_NO_NODE == -1]
Fixes: 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override")
Fixes: 63692df103e9 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
CC: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index 9261868..50f4747 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -216,7 +216,12 @@ static ssize_t numa_node_store(struct device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node))
+ if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(node))
return -EINVAL;
add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 19:00 [PATCH v2] PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override - part 2 Mathias Krause
2015-11-24 18:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-11-24 19:27 ` Mathias Krause
2015-11-24 20:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151124184957.GB27957@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.