From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Liu Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 65066: regressions - FAIL Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:13:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20151125101303.GB15747@citrix.com> References: <1448444036.17688.7.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1448444036.17688.7.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, osstest service owner List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:33:56AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 02:30 +0000, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 65066 xen-unstable real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65066/ > > = > > Regressions :-( > > = > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > =A0test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0fail REGR. vs. 64035 > = > We discussed this possibility IRL when the "minios: don't rely on specific > page table allocation scheme" fix was being made for the issue exposed by > the changes to the domain builder to support larger guests. > = > The rumpkernel flights have been disabled for a while now pending a > reworking of osstest to cope with an upstream change to the build system, > so there is no possibility, at the moment, of getting the mini-os fix into > upstream rump and then through our rumpkernel push gate and into the xen- > unstable tests. > = > Therefore I believe we concluded we would force push this failure. > = > But before I did so I just wanted to confirm I'd understood the plan. > = Yes. Force push please. This failure is expected. Wei.