From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:16:44 -0800 Message-ID: <20151125181644.GI2517@atomide.com> References: <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com> <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com> <201510122225.12786@pali> <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali> <20151105114041.GC27908@pali> <20151105161756.GG3078@atomide.com> <5643E716.9080204@gmail.com> <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Cc: Pavel Machek , Frank Rowand , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Laura Abbott , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Will Deacon , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [151123 06:46]: > On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > > Adding devicetree list. > > >=20 > > > Thread starts at > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/3= 54459.html > > >=20 > > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [151105 03:41]: > > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Roh=C3=A1r wrote: > > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > >>>> * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [151012 13:29]: > > > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comme= nts > > > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much= agree > > > >>>>>> what needs to be done. > > >=20 > > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this se= ries. > > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a trans= port > > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). > >=20 > > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? > >=20 > > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it wou= ld > > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > > Pavel >=20 > Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for > adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is > missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? > I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and > discarded. At least I don't have better solutions in mind. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:16:44 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry In-Reply-To: <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> References: <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com> <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com> <201510122225.12786@pali> <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali> <20151105114041.GC27908@pali> <20151105161756.GG3078@atomide.com> <5643E716.9080204@gmail.com> <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> Message-ID: <20151125181644.GI2517@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Pali Roh?r [151123 06:46]: > On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > > Adding devicetree list. > > > > > > Thread starts at > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html > > > > > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Pali Roh?r [151105 03:41]: > > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Roh?r wrote: > > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > >>>> * Pali Roh?r [151012 13:29]: > > > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments > > > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree > > > >>>>>> what needs to be done. > > > > > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series. > > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport > > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). > > > > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? > > > > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would > > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > > Pavel > > Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for > adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is > missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? > I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and > discarded. At least I don't have better solutions in mind. Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751457AbbKYSQ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:16:59 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:48514 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750755AbbKYSQv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:16:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:16:44 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Cc: Pavel Machek , Frank Rowand , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Laura Abbott , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Will Deacon , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry Message-ID: <20151125181644.GI2517@atomide.com> References: <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com> <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com> <201510122225.12786@pali> <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali> <20151105114041.GC27908@pali> <20151105161756.GG3078@atomide.com> <5643E716.9080204@gmail.com> <20151122065146.GD26074@amd> <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20151123144545.GD24147@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Pali Rohár [151123 06:46]: > On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > > Adding devicetree list. > > > > > > Thread starts at > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html > > > > > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Pali Rohár [151105 03:41]: > > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > >>>> * Pali Rohár [151012 13:29]: > > > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments > > > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree > > > >>>>>> what needs to be done. > > > > > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series. > > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport > > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). > > > > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? > > > > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would > > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > > Pavel > > Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for > adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is > missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? > I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and > discarded. At least I don't have better solutions in mind. Regards, Tony