Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version

[Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:36:58PM +0100, aluno3@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
> dmesg when mounting volume which was formated xfsprogs 4.3.0:
> 
> *
> root@192.168.176.24:~$ mkfs.xfs -V
> mkfs.xfs version 4.3.0
> 
> root@192.168.176.24:~$ mkfs.xfs  -f -m crc=0,finobt=0 /dev/sdc4
> meta-data=/dev/sdc4              isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=474552 blks
>          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
>          =                       crc=0        finobt=0, sparse=0
> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=1898208, imaxpct=25
>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0 ftype=1
> log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
>          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
> 
> root@192.168.176.24:~$ mount /dev/sdc4 /mnt/sdc4
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc4,
>        missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> 
>        In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>        dmesg | tail or so.
> 
> root@192.168.176.24:~$ dmesg
> [  212.984534] XFS (sdc4): bad version
> [  212.984547] ffff88005cccb000: 58 46 53 42 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 1c f6 e0  XFSB............
> [  212.984550] ffff88005cccb010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00  ................
> [  212.984551] ffff88005cccb020: 55 9d 20 d9 1c e9 4e a9 a3 ee 8d fd ba
> 68 b3 70  U. ...N......h.p
> [  212.984553] ffff88005cccb030: 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 04 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 80  ................
> [  212.984556] XFS (sdc4): Internal error xfs_sb_read_verify at line 730
> of file fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c.  Caller 0xffffffff81256c7d
> 

Interesting... have you tried to format without ftype support? It looks
like that wasn't introduced until v3.13. E.g.,

	mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=0 -n ftype=0 <dev>

Brian

> [  212.984560] CPU: 0 PID: 440 Comm: kworker/0:1H Tainted: P           O
> 3.10.92-oe64-ge331686 #15
> [  212.984562] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product
> Name/P5WDG2 WS Pro, BIOS 0905    03/06/2008
> [  212.984567] Workqueue: xfslogd xfs_buf_iodone_work
> [  212.984570]  ffffffff81692f75 ffffffff81258c5d ffffffff81256c7d
> ffffffff818a39e3
> [  212.984573]  ffff88007aa9ef00 0000000000000016 ffff88007aa8b000
> 0000000000000000
> [  212.984576]  ffff88007ea17800 ffffffff812a32ac ffffffff81256c7d
> ffff88007ea11a40
> [  212.984579] Call Trace:
> [  212.984584]  [<ffffffff81692f75>] ? dump_stack+0xc/0x15
> [  212.984587]  [<ffffffff81258c5d>] ? xfs_corruption_error+0x8d/0x90
> [  212.984590]  [<ffffffff81256c7d>] ? xfs_buf_iodone_work+0x6d/0x90
> [  212.984595]  [<ffffffff812a32ac>] ? xfs_sb_read_verify+0xfc/0x120
> [  212.984598]  [<ffffffff81256c7d>] ? xfs_buf_iodone_work+0x6d/0x90
> [  212.984600]  [<ffffffff81256c7d>] ? xfs_buf_iodone_work+0x6d/0x90
> [  212.984604]  [<ffffffff8105ce4d>] ? process_one_work+0x13d/0x3b0
> [  212.984607]  [<ffffffff8105d7b1>] ? worker_thread+0x121/0x3d0
> [  212.984609]  [<ffffffff8105d690>] ? manage_workers.isra.26+0x280/0x280
> [  212.984613]  [<ffffffff81062e92>] ? kthread+0xc2/0xd0
> [  212.984616]  [<ffffffff81070000>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x30/0x100
> [  212.984619]  [<ffffffff81062dd0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
> [  212.984623]  [<ffffffff8169db98>] ? ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
> [  212.984626]  [<ffffffff81062dd0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
> [  212.984628] XFS (sdc4): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
> [  212.984634] XFS (sdc4): SB validate failed with error 22.
> *
> 
> On 11/26/15 14:50, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:18:51PM +0100, aluno3@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
> >> Yes I used -f option with 4.X version of xfsprogs but mounting the
> >> volume was not possible - before mkfs.xfs finished successfully
> >> (mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=0,finobt=0).
> >>
> > 
> > You posted the output associated with the crc=1 fs mount failure, what
> > happens when you try to mount after formatting with crc=0?
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> >> Should I stay in 3.1.X family of xfsprogs or is it recommended to use at
> >> least 3.2.x version with kernel 3.10?
> >>
> >> The most I care about xfs_repair.
> >>
> >> On 11/26/15 13:26, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> >>> Le Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:21:45 +0100
> >>> "aluno3@poczta.onet.pl" <aluno3@poczta.onet.pl> écrivait:
> >>>
> >>>> mkfs.xfs -m crc=0,finobt=0
> >>>>
> >>>> but it does not work with 4.X version of xfsprogs. Call trace also
> >>>> occurred so I tried to use 3.2.4 family with crc=0,finobt=0 and volume
> >>>> mounted successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Did you use -f? else mkfs.xfs won't do anything as it'll detect an
> >>> existing filesystem.
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> xfs mailing list
> >> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> >> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs