From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751529AbbK1AEh (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:04:37 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37875 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219AbbK1AEg (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:04:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:04:32 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Rasmus Villemoes , Felipe Balbi , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: musb: convert printk to pr_* Message-ID: <20151128000432.GA22297@kroah.com> References: <1448620703-13101-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <56584B45.8000601@cogentembedded.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56584B45.8000601@cogentembedded.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 03:23:33PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 11/27/2015 1:38 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > >This file already uses pr_debug in a few places; this converts the > >remaining printks. > > Are you aware that printk(KERN_DEBUG, ...) and pr_debug() are not equivalent? Yes, and that is a good thing, you should be using pr_debug() instead of printk(KERN_DEBUG...). Why object to something like this? greg k-h