From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: efi-stub.txt: Fix arm64 paths Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:32:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20151130113237.GC2441@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1448726603-17600-1-git-send-email-alan@softiron.co.uk> <20151130112859.GB2441@codeblueprint.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151130112859.GB2441@codeblueprint.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Ott Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Roy Franz , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Leif Lindholm List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Nov, at 11:28:59AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov, at 11:03:23AM, Alan Ott wrote: > > Update documented paths for arm64 files to match current tree. > > --- > > Documentation/efi-stub.txt | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/efi-stub.txt b/Documentation/efi-stub.txt > > index 7747024..e157469 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/efi-stub.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/efi-stub.txt > > @@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ arch/x86/boot/header.S and arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c, > > respectively. For ARM the EFI stub is implemented in > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/efi-header.S and > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/efi-stub.c. EFI stub code that is shared > > -between architectures is in drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c. > > +between architectures is in drivers/firmware/efi/libstub. > > > > For arm64, there is no compressed kernel support, so the Image itself > > masquerades as a PE/COFF image and the EFI stub is linked into the > > kernel. The arm64 EFI stub lives in arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S > > -and arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c. > > +and drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm64-stub.c. > > > > By using the EFI boot stub it's possible to boot a Linux kernel > > without the use of a conventional EFI boot loader, such as grub or > > Thanks Alan, applied. Umm.. actually could you resend this with your Signed-off-by tag, please? Then I'll apply it.