From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:05:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130133526.GD4899@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448885103.8275.31.camel@pengutronix.de>
On 30-11-15, 13:05, Lucas Stach wrote:
> I don't want to block this patch on that, but maybe as a thought for
> further consideration: Wouldn't it make sense to use a single unbound
> deferrable work item for this? There was some work to make this possible
> already: "timer: make deferrable cpu unbound timers really not bound to
> a cpu"
Yes, it would be sensible but that work has gone nowhere since April.
Once that is merged, we can think about it.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-29 12:27 [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Update sampling rate only for concerned policies Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03 2:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Work is guaranteed to be pending Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: governor: Pass policy as argument to ->gov_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: governor: initialize/destroy timer_mutex with 'shared' Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-30 20:46 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-10-31 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-03 19:01 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-11-30 12:05 ` Lucas Stach
2015-11-30 13:35 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpufreq: ondemand: update update_sampling_rate() to make it more efficient Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-27 5:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03 2:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151130133526.GD4899@ubuntu \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.