From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Anup Limbu <anuplimbu14@gmail.com>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: davinci: remove unnecessary if cases
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:40:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151201004008.GR64635@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448611534-21142-1-git-send-email-anuplimbu14@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:35:34PM +0530, Anup Limbu wrote:
> remove unnecessary if cases
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Limbu <anuplimbu14@gmail.com>
> ---
Did you test this?
> drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> index c72313d..1f86ee1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> @@ -568,21 +568,16 @@ static struct davinci_nand_pdata
> pdev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
> if (!pdata)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> - "ti,davinci-chipselect", &prop))
> - pdev->id = prop;
> - else
> + if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "ti,davinci-chipselect", &pdev->id))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> - "ti,davinci-mask-ale", &prop))
> - pdata->mask_ale = prop;
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> - "ti,davinci-mask-cle", &prop))
> - pdata->mask_cle = prop;
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> - "ti,davinci-mask-chipsel", &prop))
> - pdata->mask_chipsel = prop;
> + of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "ti,davinci-mask-ale", &pdata->mask_ale);
> + of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "ti,davinci-mask-cle", &pdata->mask_cle);
> + of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "ti,davinci-mask-chipsel", &pdata->mask_chipsel);
> if (!of_property_read_string(pdev->dev.of_node,
> "nand-ecc-mode", &mode) ||
> !of_property_read_string(pdev->dev.of_node,
> @@ -594,9 +589,8 @@ static struct davinci_nand_pdata
> if (!strncmp("hw", mode, 2))
> pdata->ecc_mode = NAND_ECC_HW;
> }
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> - "ti,davinci-ecc-bits", &prop))
> - pdata->ecc_bits = prop;
> + of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "ti,davinci-ecc-bits", &pdata->ecc_bits);
NAK! You're treating a u8 as u32. This should give you some subset of
the following warnings, from gcc and sparse:
In file included from include/linux/of_device.h:8:0,
from drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:35:
include/linux/of.h:857:19: note: expected ‘u32 *’ but argument is of type ‘u8 *’
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c: In function ‘nand_davinci_get_pdata’:
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:593:4: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘of_property_read_u32’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:572:51: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) [sparse]
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:572:51: expected unsigned int [usertype] *out_value [sparse]
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:572:51: got int *<noident> [sparse]
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:593:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different type sizes) [sparse]
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:593:49: expected unsigned int [usertype] *out_value [sparse]
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c:593:49: got unsigned char *<noident> [sparse]
and it leaves you open to memory corruption, as of_property_read_u32()
might try clobbering 3 more bytes of data after the ecc_bits field.
All in all, there's a reason the code is written the way it is, and I
don't see any good reason to do what your patch does.
Brian
>
> prop = of_get_nand_bus_width(pdev->dev.of_node);
> if (0 < prop || !of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-27 8:05 [PATCH] mtd: nand: davinci: remove unnecessary if cases Anup Limbu
2015-12-01 0:40 ` Brian Norris [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151201004008.GR64635@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=anuplimbu14@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.