From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 03A22E00A4F; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:13:58 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.125.82.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (martin.jansa[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAF8E009EF for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so199810213wme.0 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:13:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tmDC9iEl9c5XmPTLuSHIEkC6gdTYog3iHhQ/NYIM2Jw=; b=zeqFuqp6h7aju4GtwhgRS9BeFK9mJauAIttC4xBTn3+2l0MPUmdNq67fHbR1za4xQ0 LxltQeoGEBHsNQV8cCzozWRcHh8BocumrdokJW7W4RhYd4cDd+pn/unCQU5/4iM2GRM3 VxlRc6QkpWAEqzZLU3+JXvJeGcaXVE0JB77JoBwXOLSBPDkzKvUyc7zv6X5h98qJo/Y0 hA7WMK6/sNdbkBk/xrNgXIH7LS6YItEXYKNliSG1hIXEdp6SOR/PWvl+xXTur33WJmZy QgkKZLUOSxbLI7cQrCmMXi6Kt3jhzPOisOW+fNe4h0AfiwoNHiXKuZZpmFwt/y2kaC+d VZHQ== X-Received: by 10.28.24.5 with SMTP id 5mr36309361wmy.3.1448968433204; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:13:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-86-49-34-37.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.34.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm25535975wmf.0.2015.12.01.03.13.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:13:52 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:14:51 +0100 To: "Barros Pena, Belen" Message-ID: <20151201111451.GC2251@jama> References: <1448920985-995-1-git-send-email-alejandro.franco@linux.intel.com> <2603447.ByLEse0mF5@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151201094058.GA2251@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , "Franco, Alejandro" , "Eggleton, Paul" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] [layerindex-web] recipe blacklisted information X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:13:58 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 27540 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e" Content-Disposition: inline --Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:42:49AM +0000, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 01/12/2015 09:40, "yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org on behalf of Martin > Jansa" martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > >>Another thing that just occurred to me though - apologies for not > >>raising it=20 > >>earlier - for the benefit of newer users it may be useful to explain > >>implications of the blacklisting. What I'd suggest is we put a line > >>after the=20 > >>reason on the recipe detail page saying "This means that the recipe will > >>not=20 > >>be buildable until the PNBLACKLIST value is cleared and the issue that > >>caused=20 > >>it to be added has been fixed or worked around." (Just on the recipe > >>detail=20 > >>page - not in the popup.) > >>Does that sound OK? > > > >Maybe some more information how to clear PNBLACKLIST (people often don't > >know that they can just set it to empty value in their bbappend or even > >distro/local config). >=20 > I think explaining what blacklisting means, its implications and how to > clear it is an excellent idea, but it seems there is quite a lot to say, > and the layer index itself might not be the best place to show it all. So > what about adding all this to the documentation, then link to it from the > layer index? The recipe details page would then look like the attached > image.=20 Agreed, LGTM. >=20 > Alex, sorry for nitpicking: using the .label-inverse class means that the > label in the h1 of the recipe details page also hovers. Only labels with a > tooltip should hover, so maybe we should go back to the extra class, or > just qualify the hover styles so that they only apply to .label-inverse > inside tables (td > .label-inverse:hover). Apologies: I should have picked > this up before you submitted the patch. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Bel=E9n >=20 > > > >--=20 > >Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com >=20 --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZdgKEACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBzzWQCePMtwf04gRSoJwFhGMpgBHBa2 X2sAnRAqy7C+8WfN8MUpWLmEu7AfSRTq =yiUn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e--