All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot on Intrinsyc dragonboard 810.
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:37:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202143715.GA16964@rlyeh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202135702.GQ9551@bill-the-cat>

Hi All,

Sorry I didn't posted here earlier, but It seems it's time to explain:

1) My "original" u-boot work is dirty and not good enough for mainline 
(it works properly, but has a lot of garbage, doesn't use Device Model and so on)
This are branches dragonboard, dragonboard-dev etc.

2) I'm in the middle of reworking it into "clean" code.
You can see it on dragonboard-for-mainline-rebase-29.11 branch.

As this code adds a new SoC and several drivers, I decided to ask collegue to do 
pre-review and planned to send RFC somewhere this week so there will be less 
re-submits.

@Syed: I asked you to wait few days, as I'm rebasing/squashing my for-mainline branch, 
and doing heavy reworks of core code, so your commits adding one new board would be lost.

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:57:02AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:44:17PM +0530, sk.syed2 wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >   I took dragonboard 410c source from https://github.com/hallor/u-boot/ and
> > added support for Dragonboard 810 from Intrinsyc(msm8994 soc). Currently it
> > boots to u-boot prompt after launching from little kernel(qcom boot
> > loader). Intend to add more features.
> > 
> >    Just wondering should I post a patch here against
> > https://github.com/hallor/u-boot/ for my changes?
> 
> First, it should be sent to that tree as there is not currently
> dragonboard support in mainline.

I hope to change that soon :)

> 
> Second (and why I added Mateusz Kulikowski to the emails), I see that on
> for example
> https://github.com/hallor/u-boot/blob/dragonboard/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/qcom/pmic-apq8016.c
> code is "borrowed" from LK/spmi and labled as GPL-2.0+ but
> https://github.com/Caio99BR/lk/blob/master/platform/msm_shared/include/spmi.h
> which is I beleive the "LK/spmi" in question, that is clearly BSD-3 and
> you can't just re-license code like that.

I took code from Linux/Little Kernel, as it was quickest way to get it running
A lot of it is also already removed - for example spmi looks like that right now:
https://github.com/hallor/u-boot/blob/af156ba28b03ea51bc2850cdf3c39aad06553998/arch/arm/mach-snapdragon/spmi.c

As for license rewriting - oops, I have to recheck that.
I was sure LK was GPL as well, and mechanically added GPL-2.0+ to all files - shame on me.

Best Regards,
Mateusz

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-23 18:14 [U-Boot] u-boot on Intrinsyc dragonboard 810 sk.syed2
2015-12-02 13:57 ` Tom Rini
2015-12-02 14:37   ` Mateusz Kulikowski [this message]
2015-12-02 14:57     ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151202143715.GA16964@rlyeh \
    --to=mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.