From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:30:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202153012.08b80fd9@pixies> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565EBF32.80803@redhat.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:51:46 +0200, marcel@redhat.com wrote:
> 2. We still have pci_is_express returning true, this is error prone because
> one can use this function assuming the device is express. Maybe we should
> call it "can_be_express" ?
>
> If you think this is good enough, you can simply do the same:
> - Instead of replacing the realize method, just advertise it with
> "is_express" (meaning it can be express)
> - Leave all the conditions as they were in prev patch.
> As a result, the pci config space will have the right length.
Oh but we can't do so, as the change of config space size is guest
visible and breaks migration; it must depend on your x-pcie-disable
flag :)
As I can't decide what's better, I'm following your initial suggestion
and submit for maintainers to review.
However, do note that there are few more evidence that 'pci_is_express'
is true while not necessarily placed on a pcie bus:
- pcie_endpoint_cap_init:
it tests for 'pci_bus_is_express' although 'dev' is guaranteed to be
'pci_is_express' (assertion in pcie_cap_init)
- 058fdcf 'xhci: add endpoint cap on express bus only'
Thanks,
Shmulik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 16:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-01 16:36 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-01 19:30 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-01 20:46 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 8:01 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02 9:51 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 13:30 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2015-12-02 14:00 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 14:27 ` Shmulik Ladkani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151202153012.08b80fd9@pixies \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.