From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.5] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:09:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202185403-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449066801-3002-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> In 1811e64 'hw/virtio: Add PCIe capability to virtio devices', the
> QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability was added to virtio's pci_dev, within
> 'virtio_pci_realize' - the pci device object realization method.
>
> This occurs to late, as 'pci_qdev_realize' (DeviceClass.realize of
> TYPE_PCI_DEVICE) has already been called, without knowing that the
> device instance is indeed an "express" instance, thus allocating
> insufficient pci config space.
>
> As a result, device may crash upon attempt to write to the PCIE config
> space.
>
> Fix, by arming the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in virtio-pci's
> own DeviceClass realize method.
>
> This also makes code cleaner, as 'virtio_pci_realize' may now access the
> 'pci_is_express' predicate when needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
> ---
>
> Since v1: naming change, as suggested by Marcel Apfelbaum
>
> hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index dd48562..67f4003 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -1814,13 +1814,10 @@ static void virtio_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
>
> address_space_init(&proxy->modern_as, &proxy->modern_cfg, "virtio-pci-cfg-as");
>
> - if (!(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_PCIE)
> - && !(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_MODERN)
> - && pci_bus_is_express(pci_dev->bus)
> - && !pci_bus_is_root(pci_dev->bus)) {
> + if (pci_is_express(pci_dev) && pci_bus_is_express(pci_dev->bus) &&
> + !pci_bus_is_root(pci_dev->bus)) {
> int pos;
>
> - pci_dev->cap_present |= QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;
> pos = pcie_endpoint_cap_init(pci_dev, 0);
> assert(pos > 0);
>
Now here you want
+ else
+ pci_dev->cap_present &= ~QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;
This will fix the bug Marcel noticed.
> @@ -1879,10 +1876,25 @@ static Property virtio_pci_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> +static void virtio_pci_dc_realize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + VirtioPCIClass *vpciklass = VIRTIO_PCI_GET_CLASS(qdev);
> + VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = VIRTIO_PCI(qdev);
> + PCIDevice *pci_dev = &proxy->pci_dev;
> +
> + if (!(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_PCIE) &&
> + !(proxy->flags & VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_MODERN)) {
> + pci_dev->cap_present |= QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;
> + }
> +
> + vpciklass->parent_dc_realize(qdev, errp);
> +}
> +
> static void virtio_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> + VirtioPCIClass *vpciklass = VIRTIO_PCI_CLASS(klass);
>
> dc->props = virtio_pci_properties;
> k->realize = virtio_pci_realize;
> @@ -1890,6 +1902,8 @@ static void virtio_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET;
> k->revision = VIRTIO_PCI_ABI_VERSION;
> k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_OTHERS;
> + vpciklass->parent_dc_realize = dc->realize;
> + dc->realize = virtio_pci_dc_realize;
> dc->reset = virtio_pci_reset;
> }
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> index ffb74bb..a104ff2 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ typedef struct {
>
> typedef struct VirtioPCIClass {
> PCIDeviceClass parent_class;
> + DeviceRealize parent_dc_realize;
> void (*realize)(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp);
> } VirtioPCIClass;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-02 14:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.5] virtio-pci: Set the QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS capability early in its DeviceClass realize method Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02 15:11 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 16:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-12-02 17:12 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02 17:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-12-02 17:21 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-12-02 17:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-12-02 17:50 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-12-02 17:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151202185403-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.